HLA Blog

Design Guidelines Cliffnotes

2012-01-20T07:00:00Z

The March 2011 issue of Zoning Practice (American Planning Association) was authored by HLA Senior Associate Doug Hammel, and describes some key considerations in drafting effective design guidelines or form-based regulations. This blog posting is a "cheat sheet" version of that article. To obtain a copy of the full article, visit the American Planning Association.

What are design guidelines...or what AREN'T they?
It is important to remember that design guidelines should articulate an attainable product within the given local context. Creating standards based on "ideals" or models imported from other communities can often lead to incongruity with lot conditions, market realities, or the local vision. Within that framework, they can range from adopted regulations (i.e. form-based code), binding based on certain conditions (i.e. incentive-based) or simply advisory but non-binding.

Understand the users and administrators.
Too often, stakeholders want to start the process by debating over the minutia of design. But it is necessary to first think about who will be administering and interpreting the design standards. This will also help determine what kind of end document is necessary and how the standards should be written and illustrated. Will the guidelines be regulatory, incentivized, or advisory? Will municipal planning staff, the Planning Commission, or a Design Review Board determine conformance? To what degree will standards be negotiable? The answers to these and other questions create the nuances necessary to locally implementable standards.

Determine what the guidelines should address.
Guidelines can cover a broad range of topics; private development to public realm, general site planning to architectural details and materials, sustainability, etc. An understanding of local priorities and shortcomings of existing policies can help determine the most appropriate role for design standards. This comes from previous plans, focused visioning, and a "compatibility test" of how zoning regulations align with development goals for a specific area.

Test, test, test!
Block sizes, parcel dimensions, traffic patterns, and several other factors vary between neighborhoods and communities. Design concepts must be tested on actual parcels in order to ensure that 1) what is being asked is possible, and 2) the proposed standards and metrics result in the desired outcome. As many scenarios as possible should be considered; mid-block versus corner lots, alley versus street access, single-story retail versus mixed-use, etc. The result will be standards that are calibrated to local conditions, rather than those inappropriately imposed on existing lots.

Make an engaging and informative document.
Design guidelines can come in different packages, and packaging should be determined by how they are used. If they are advisory, they may use few specific metrics and more illustrations to convey an anticipated outcome of development. If they are regulatory and administered as part of zoning entitlement, they must express clear measures of conformance and be defensible against litigation. If the administrators have no formal training in design, they must clearly convey design elements and metrics and remove undue interpretation. Whatever the case, the balanced use of carefully crafted language, metrics, and graphics is essential. The intent may be sound, but if it is not clearly communicated, the guidelines will go unimplemented.

Coordinate other development regulations and policies.
It is shocking how many communities will undertake the process of drafting design guidelines only to leave in place development regulations that contradict their intent. Something's gotta give. Either the design guidelines must stop short of trying to "fix" characteristics not permitted by zoning, or the zoning regulations must be amended to enable the desired design condition as expressed in the guidelines. Either way, ending up with contradictory policies results in ineffective guidelines.

Delivering Better Plans

2012-01-05T20:01:42Z

To be successful, plans need to inspire and create excitement within a community. To do that, they must be more than just a hundred pages of text with a few obligatory maps.

In the past, a plan would sit on bookshelves in the back offices of City Hall. Today, they are highly visible and accessible, posted online for everyone to see and use. As such, they must be inspirational, easy to use, and easy to understand by everyone in the community.

Our PAS Memo for the Amercian Planning Association presents an overview of some of the trends and issues that are affecting plan making; provides considerations to draft better text; and reviews tips for producing better graphics to help planners improve the maps, charts, illustrations, plans, and documents they produce.

We have been asked by the APA to embargo our article for one month from publication. So for now, the article is only available to PAS subscribers.

Gas Stations: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

2012-01-04T12:30:00Z

Gas stations. They're everywhere. They are as critical a component of infrastructure as schools, parks, and sewer treatment facilities. Their functional and design elements - signage, lighting, site access, etc. - have a profound impact on the character of our most visible corridors. So how can this necessary piece of the puzzle complement, or at least not deter from, local character? Let's look at a few examples.

The Good

This example is from East Lansing, MI. It demonstrates several site and building design characteristics that help it blend in with the commercial corridor, rather than being an eyesore competing for attention:

The pumping stations are located to the rear of the site with the primary building toward the front corner, bringing vehicular access away from the intersection.
The public sidewalk that is less disrupted by curb cuts (about one-quarter to one-third of the total lot frontage).
Cross-access is provided to the lot to the east, removing the need to enter back into traffic to go next door.
Signage is very low, and the building and front yard landscaping screen the pumping canopy and light.

And despite this design approach, people still find the pumps!

The ~~Bad~~ Typical

This is an example of a typical Chicago corner gas station. In this instance, the character of the development is more compromised for the sake of the automobile, although the urban setting dictates that the surrounding pedestrian network is maintained.

The primary building is at the back corner of the site, and the pumps and canopy are front and center.
Curb cuts occupy about two-thirds of the lot frontage, creating several vehicular/pedestrian conflict points (including at the location of a bus stop).
A prominent monument sign is located at the primary corner, with another sign located at the southeast corner of the site.
Alley access is completely unutilized and the glowing lights of the canopy impact adjacent residential development.
Property edge landscaping and fencing provide at least some delineation between vehicular areas and the public sidewalk.

As a whole, this development model does the minimum required in terms of the overall functionality and character of the corridor.

The Ugly

This gas station (location removed to protect the guilty) demonstrates perhaps the worst practices in gas station development:

The canopy is located almost to the front lot line. This results in one continuous curb cut along the entire front yard.
Site access is both unclear and unsafe, as newly filled vehicles pull into traffic and arriving vehicles seek an open bay.
The canopy is so prominent that, from the southern approach to the site, the large monument sign is not even visible.
Though there is access to the side street to the north of the site, it is unused because access from the primary arterial is uncontrolled.

In this case, there is no consideration for the pedestrian network or the overall character of the corridor.

As planners, we must remain realistic about what can be expected of development. It is probably unreasonable to think that gas stations will ever recreate the character of our intimate town centers. However, a better product can be realized with relatively simple standards for site planning and access, signage, lighting, and landscaping. I mean, if we're going to be paying $5 a gallon, we at least deserve that much!

Planning in The Onion

2011-12-21T14:31:29Z

We often say around our office that "we don't take ourselves seriously, but we take our work seriously" and those of you who know us would agree. When there is work to be done or a deadline upon us we are all business - but we still like to joke and have fun. Every friday morning, Kenny, our door man, greets us with a new issue of "The Onion". It lives on our break room counter for a few days, each of us getting a few good laughs while we wait for our coffee to brew. Occasionally, there is a planning related article that is clipped and circulated. Below are some of our favorites. If you are a bit of a planning geek and have a sense of humor, enjoy.

1. Obama Replaces Costly High-Speed Rail Plan With High-Speed Bus Plan

Obama Replaces Costly High-Speed Rail Plan With High-Speed Bus Plan

2. Urban Planner Clearly Depressed When She Came Up With Street Names

Full image

3. Chicago Out Of Names For Subdivisions

"We have used every tree, body of water, and living thing in the almanac. You don't have to drive all the way out to Kevin Acres to know we need a new naming system." Full Article

4. City Councilman Unearths Magical Zoning Amulet

"With this sigil, the power of zoning comes. Through me, the power of zoning flows! All will behold my power, and I shall bow to no man when designating matter-of-right developments for major retail and office spaces to a maximum lot occupancy of 75 percent for residential use!" Full Article

5. Zoning Committee Meets, Zones A Bunch Of ....[stuff]

"The Norcross City Council zoning committee is celebrating what it described as a "monster" zoning session Monday. "Man, we were zoning $#it left and right. You wouldn't believe the $#it we zoned..." Full Article

6. Alderman Has That Zoning Dream Again

"Pelson said the dream always ends the same way, with him experiencing the sensation of falling out of his office chair into a 60 percent business, 40 percent residential abyss" Full Article

7. Ten Years Of Life Dedicated To Getting Municipal Pool Not Built

Draper, now 47, began his long battle against the public pool in May 1995, when the former director of public works, Bart Janklow, proposed it. Draper mobilized a coalition of six citizens who opposed the pool due to its expense and the traffic congestion and noise it might create. Full Article

8. Report: 98 Percent Of U.S. Commuters Favor Public Transportation For Others

"Of the study's 5,200 participants, 44 percent cited faster commutes as the primary reason to expand public transportation, followed closely by shorter lines at the gas station."

"Expanding mass transit isn't just a good idea, it's a necessity," Holland said. "My drive to work is unbelievable. I spend more than two hours stuck in 12 lanes of traffic. It's about time somebody did something to get some of these other cars off the road." Full Article

9. Urban Planner Stuck in Traffic of Own Design

"According to Rothstein, it was then that the Urban Redevelopment Authority, along with several private urban-planning firms, began the slow process of rethinking the city's roads, parks, and commercial and residential districts. Today, the city's designers are regularly lauded for their elegant, modern buildings and stuck in traffic of their own making for hours at a time." Article Link

]]>

Doug Hammel Joins HLA

2011-11-14T20:16:26Z

Houseal Lavigne Associates is pleased to announce the addition of Doug Hammel, AICP as a Senior Associate. Doug is an experienced city planner and urban designer with a broad background in planning, design, transportation, and development regulation. Doug can be contacted at (312) 372-1008 ext 118, or dhammel@hlplanning.com

Doug Hammel, AICP

Resume at a Glance:

-Over 12 years of professional consulting experience
-Speaker at local, state and national events
-Recently published in March 2011 issue of APA's Zoning Practice
-Planning expertise includes:

Land use
Urban design
Downtown, corridor, and neighborhood planning
TOD
Transportation and transit planning
Design guidelines
Zoning and form-based codes
Strategic implementation

-Project experience in:

Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
New York
North Dakota
Ohio
Texas

Key Considerations for Community Outreach

2011-09-13T19:01:28Z

Every planner should know the basics of citizen participation and if you don't...shame on you. Pick up a book, take a course, observe a public workshop run by someone that knows what they're doing,...do something to become competent with community outreach. For those familiar with its importance, good...keep developing your skills. Citizen participation is vitally important in the community planning process and residents are an important resource and essential for identifying the issues, needs, priorities, opportunities, and aspirations of a community.

However, there are several important outreach considerations that are often overlooked by "experts" and novices alike. The better you understand the following the better and more effective your outreach will be.

Neighbors informing neighbors...
It is not uncommon for some residents (or officials for that matter) to think they know all the answers...what is most important for a city to address. However, the range of issues and possibilities begins to expand when neighbors learn from one another. As important as it is for planners, staff, and officials to hear what residents think is important, it may be more important for residents to hear what their neighbors think is important. This simple process expands how a community is viewed by its residents and allows individuals to see their community from a new and broader perspective. Remember, this is one of the most important benefits of effective citizen participation...an open dialogue that expands the insight and understanding of community residents...a process that lets residents hear directly from other residents.

Business owners are "residents"...
Remember, business owners, property owners, and business managers should be all be considered residents, whether the individuals live within the city or not. Business and property owners are one of the more consistently excluded groups from traditional outreach. Business owners have a unique and important perspective, often having a list of needs and issues not known to or understood by most residents. Without business and property owners, cities couldn't function or exist. Make sure you reach the business folks directly. Have a workshop just for them. Have it in the morning before 9:00 a.m. Give them lots of coffee and some bagels. Be efficient with their time and get them back to their businesses in a timely manner. If they are like most business owners, they always thinking about what would make their businesses better. Make sure you know what is important to them and what would make the community more business-friendly and supportive.

But what about the children...
So much of our community is geared toward the kids, but when was the last time your city asked children what should be done to improve things. You'd be surprised at how insightful kids can be. Trust me, they'll come up with ideas no adult ever thought of...and some of them are pretty good ideas. Reach out to the schools. Outreach to kids for city initiatives makes a great civics lesson. Teachers love it and kids appreciate distraction from math lessons. It might not be as much fun as a field trip, but it's more fun than a substitute teacher. Kids view their world in a totally different perspective and it's a perspective you need to understand. Be creative!

Cast a wide net...
The widest possible range of community input should be sought in the planning process. Drawing in the values and sensitivities of a broadly-based constituency ensures that all interests are represented in the evaluation and decision-making process. Use several mediums and outreach formats to maximize participation - face-to-face, on-line, one-on-one interviews, small groups, large groups, open houses, formal presentations, local television, radio, newsletters, surveys, work with established groups (chamber, historic preservation society, friends of the river, downtown business association, schools, whoever is appropriate, available, and willing). Be creative. You can't make people participate, but you should give them every possible chance to participate. Simply having the token "community meeting" is not enough. Trust me, it will pay off in the end when the plan has a broad base of support from a wide range of constituents.

Circle back...
If residents take the time to participate, they deserve some follow-up. Circle back after each outreach activity with a "thank you" to those who participated and a summary of what took place and what was accomplished. Provide a summary or overview of the results in a newsletter or on-line. This is a simple tactic that makes a big difference. We're not talking about a personal letter to everyone who participated, just an article, a memo, an on-line post, something that acknowledges, informs, and thanks residents for giving their time and letting everyone know what took place.

Make it fun...
If outreach is boring, disorganized, and poorly run and managed, people will not participate. They may come to the first meeting, but they won't be back. And rather than building support for the plan, you may actually be building animosity toward the plan and process. Make outreach fun, but keep it well managed. Use creative and effective techniques such as key pad polling, design charrettes, small break-out groups, and more. Even large group workshops should be engaging, fun, and relatively informal. The key is to engage residents and have them participate, not just show up and sit there. Make it fun and informative for them and they'll show up next time...and maybe they'll bring a friend.

Houseal and Lavigne Speak on Delivering Better Plans

2011-09-07T20:20:45Z

Join John Houseal and Devin Lavigne as they speak on an upcoming panel, Delivering Better Plans and Recommendations in Text, Graphics and Speech. This presentation is sponsored by the Chicago Metro Section of the Illinois Chapter of the American Planning Association. John and Devin will be joined by John Harris of a5 inc., a marketing and communications firm. All three panelists will present the benefits of using multi-media to convey clear and concise messages in planning documents and presentations. Planners of all levels will benefit from techniques and examples to help build the skills necessary to effectively communicate planning information and data in text, graphics, and speech. This event is also applicable to practitioners in other fields such as engineering, architecture, landscape architecture, development, and non-profit management.

The workshop will take place Thursday, September 15, from 9:00-11:00 am in the CMAP offices (Willis Tower, 233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 800) in Chicago. The cost is $15 and is payable at the door but registration is requested by September 12 (via apachicagometrosection@yahoo.com). Two (2) CM credits are available for AICP members.

Time Travel at 79 degrees (approx)

2011-08-26T05:58:55Z

I traveled through time last night, driving along Ogden Avenue in Naperville. I started my trip heading westbound at Naper Boulevard. According to the digital readerboard at the CVS the time was 7:06 and it was 79 degrees. A mile west, 7:02 (and a degree cooler) courtesy of Dick Portillo. I contemplated heading to Yorkville to play the previous night's lotto, but once I reached Washington Street, a local bank reported it was 7:13 - the future, which by the way, is warmer...80 degrees.

Time Travel Theory 1
A wormhole exists along a section of Ogden Avenue and the micro-climates throughout the corridor may hold the key to global warming.

Time Travel Theory 2
The Vegasification of Ogden Avenue and its cheap "Lite-Brite" like signs don't sync with a World Clock and have differing thermostats.

Image by jasoneppink via Flickr

I'm skeptical about the need for LED readerboard signs. Forget about the fact that the resolution of these things is circa 1980. I don't think they are needed, not all of them anyway. A bank for instance, does not need a sign with current mortgage rates. Nobody is driving their car looking for low mortgage rates, and besides, your rates are the same as everyone else's - low. Portillo's...seriously, "Enjoy a Milk Shake".... this is why you wanted a sign, to get $2.35?

If I'm wrong, and a business is a blown fuse away from bankruptcy and this sign is so badly needed, we don't need the time or the temperature. My estimate is about 99.9% of the cars on the road have clocks in them, and about 99.9% of the drivers have cell phones that tell time - - we know what time it is. The same goes for the temperature. Plus we can look out our windshields, or better yet, roll down a window. If you are looking to do a public service, then promote a community event. The Arcada Theatre in Downtown St. Charles is promoting our August 31st Community Workshop on their marquess (and a theatre I might add, is a business that makes a good case for a readerboard sign).

I think communities are overreacting to the "need" for these signs. We are in a recession, and everybody is doing a little less business. Compromising the appearance of our commercial areas to inundate motorists with useless information is not the solution. I would argue in the case of Ogden Avenue in Naperville, that if instead of more signs, these businesses spent a little more money on landscaping and improved the appearance and atmosphere of the corridor, Ogden would be a representative of Naperville and it would attract more business.

Another HLA staff member inducted into Lambda Alpha

2011-06-16T02:02:22Z

Courtney Kashima has been accepted into Lambda Alpha International, the Honorary Society for the Advancement of Land Economics. Courtney joins firm Principals John Houseal and Devin Lavigne and Principal Associate Dan Gardner who are also members of the prestigious organization.

About LAI

Richard T. Ely
1854-1943

Lambda Alpha International, the Honorary Society for the Advancement of Land Economics, was founded in 1930 under the leadership of the renowned land economist and champion of academic freedom, Richard T. Ely. As an honorary society, it provides a forum for the study and advancement of land economics where the "winnowing and sifting" of ideas takes place in an atmosphere of mutual respect.

Individuals who have made notable contributions to the study and ethical practice of land use are invited to join Lambda Alpha International. Now numbering more than 2,000 members worldwide, Lambda Alpha International is an apolitical not-for-profit professional organization.

Organizational Goals
The Society's original goal of "fostering a closer association with academia and professionals involved with land economics and related fields", while still valid today, has expanded. The Society is now a catalyst for the advancement of land economics by facilitating the interaction of members who have distinguished themselves in their professions, their communities and through academic achievements. Lambda Alpha International provides an opportunity for distinguished practitioners and scholars to come together in fellowship to discuss, debate and perhaps solve dilemmas involving use of our land resources.

Introducing Planning Mapper

2011-04-09T12:42:42Z

Planning Mapper is a community issues mapping tool conceived as a means of broadening community outreach and providing a way for participants in a planning process to link their comments, thoughts and ideas to a geographic place in their community. It was created by Houseal Lavigne Associates' Principal and co-founder Devin Lavigne in 2006. The mapping tool that incorporates a widely available mapping engine (Google Maps) and transforms it into a planning process and allows residents, stakeholders and other participants to provide feedback and input tied spatially to an area or point. In essence the tool provides a way for any resident to create a map of their community, identifying their own issues, opportunities, weaknesses and threats. It is fun and engaging and represents a response to a fundamental shift in the habits and attitudes of residents who seek to do nearly everything online.

Responding to Change
In just the last 5½ years our firm, Houseal Lavigne Associates, has conducted almost 100 different planning studies, 25 of them Comprehensive Plans. A critical component of each and every planning process is to conduct meaningful outreach with residents and stakeholders to ensure the plans, policies and recommendations are rooted in, and reflective of, the community's aspirations. As a consulting firm we cannot simply push our own agendas and thoughts, and address only what we feel are the community's priorities. To be successful a plan must be the product of the community, and respond to priorities and issues identified by its leaders, its residents, its businesses and its stakeholders through an effective and responsive outreach process.

The world around us has changed however, and the widespread use of technology is commonplace. The ability to communicate via the internet is expected. Social networking sites keep us connected to friends and colleagues, RSS feeds keep us connected to current events, and websites provide a portal to unlimited information. To be truly innovative and keep a planning process "plugged in", use of the internet must extend beyond surveys, questionnaires, and calendars. While these tools are effective and important, our mapping tool allows "charrette style" participation via the internet by providing the means for anyone from anywhere who has access to a computer to mark up a map, locate priority issues and areas, and create the narrative to go along with "their" map of "their" community - an aspect of digital outreach, that until now did not exist. This innovative tool allows a community to incrementally yet collectively identify and prioritize key redevelopment sites, problematic intersections, community assets, and much, much more. As an aid in the planning and outreach process, it is proving to be invaluable.

Easy to use, accommodating of detail, and geared to the individual, Planning Mapper is truly innovative and effective. In an age where people seem increasingly busy, greater efforts are required to effectively and creatively engage residents and other stakeholders. The Community Mapper is a leap forward in maximizing an individual's and a community's contribution to the planning process.

Moving Beyond the Browser
While the browser based mapping tool is effective for outreach, exporting the data to GIS facilitates a level of analysis that a planner may need to draw better conclusions and perform a more thorough analysis of data. Through a simple and intuitive process, point data can be exported as a text file and imported into GIS for presentation and analysis. Using the X and Y values, GIS can place points, projecting the data if necessary, in the GIS space where points were placed on the mapping tool. This GIS analysis provides the ability to analyze the points in any number of ways and built spatial relationships with other data, such as census data and parcel information.

Overlays and Other Improvements
Throughout the tool's development it was rigorously tested for performance and bugs. Several rounds of beta testing was conducted within our firm searching for bugs and other issues. After several weeks of fixes it went live, but not before we improved upon the Google Maps online mapping system. We did this by adding a code compiler that allows us to add GIS data to the maps, making them more relevant and familiar to the users. Through a relatively simple process, GIS Data, such as municipal boundaries, zoning districts, park sites are overlayed on top of Google Maps information. Planning Mapper provides this functionality, converting ArcGIS Shape files (.shp) to KML files (.kml - KML Keyhole Markup Language for expressing geographic annotation and visualization on existing or future Internet-based, two-dimensional maps and three-dimensional Earth browsers such as Google Earth).

An Adaptable Tool for any Type of Study
Planning Mapper was not created with any one project in mind - it was built with every project in mind. Limited by only the geographic coverage of Google Maps, Planning Mapper can be customized to be used in any type of planning study and then some. Each project can be customized with its own type of points and legend, boundary, title, description, and overlays. To date the tool has been used in a variety of projects, in several different states.

Houseal Lavigne Associates in Boston

2011-04-05T16:00:00Z

Stop by the Houseal Lavigne Associates booth (#204) April 9^th-April 11^th during the APA National Conference in Boston. Leave your business card and be entered to win an Apple iPad2!

We will have examples of our award-winning work on-hand and will be available to answer your questions about our service lines. For example, learn about our innovative community outreach methods, detailed market analysis, and comprehensive plans.

During the conference, John Houseal, AICP, will be speaking on a panel with Bruce Knight, FAICP, and Rob Kowalski, AICP entitled, "Reinventing the Planning Department for Economic Survival" (S484) on Sunday, April 10th at 4:00 p.m. John Houseal, AICP, and Devin Lavigne, AICP, LEED-AP, will present, "Better Graphics, Better Plans" (S506) on Monday, April 11th at 10:30 a.m.

HLA Office Space Wins AIA Award

2011-03-22T19:36:30Z

The jury from St. Louis, Missouri, chaired by Eugene Mackey, FAIA, selected Houseal Lavigne's Chicago office space for a 2011 AlA Michigan Award of Honor. The award will be presented to InFORM Studio, architect, for "harmonious, simple, clean, pleasant, engaging views. A great balance of glass and solid planes." For more information on inFORM Studio, visit their website: http://www.in-formstudio.com

inFORM's Description of the Project

The renovation of an eleventh floor suite in the 1926 Art Deco Metropolitan Building, located in the heart of the Chicago theater district, provided a unique opportunity for the insertion of a progressive planning & urban design firm looking to increase their profile within the city of Chicago. An intervention of translucent acrylic, aluminum, stained MDF & birch panels generates the presence of entry while preserving the found condition of the existing suite; previously concealed below aging ceiling tile and threadbare carpeting. The office thrives in an open collaborative setting, wrought with experimentation of tectonics and materials. The reduction of public|private separation to its most essential condition permits the translation of the environment into a simple container for programmatic insertions; comprised primarily of furnishings. Workstations allow for considerable layout flexibility and are supported with moveable storage cabinets and desk mounted shelving. Aluminum, birch and MDF engage in an expressive dialogue in the detailing of the workstations, team table, conference table and reception millwork. Formal articulation of the space responds to the functional requisites of the people and equipment, manifesting in an intended space for the practice of community planning and design.

Grants & Funding

2011-03-22T18:51:28Z

Introduction

Obtaining funding through grants is one of the most productive endeavors a municipality can pursue in their effort to increase quality of life in their community. Leveraging the most out of municipal budgets is becoming an ever-increasing priority for cities and towns across the country and grants are one of the best ways to effectively do just that. Whether it is repairing potholes on Main Street, building a new park, or developing alternative housing, increasing the livability of one's community depends heavily on funding for such projects. Writing the most complete and persuasive grant proposal that one can is undeniably important for communities as they seek to provide the highest quality of life for both their residents and visitors alike.

Best Practices

All grant-awarding foundations and agencies are seeking candidates that meet a very specific set of predetermined criteria. Knowing what these agencies are looking for, as well as communicating clearly how you meet (and exceed) their criteria, is the first step in securing grant funding. Below is a list of tips to aid in that process.

Be aware of available funding opportunities: You cannot apply for grants that you don't know about! Follow the links provided below to start your search for available funding.
Follow directions: Many proposals skip steps and cut corners despite very clear instructions. These are the first proposals to get cut.
Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery: Research past awardees. Many agencies will be happy to give you a copy of past winning proposal. This will give you an edge in drafting a successful proposal.
Communicate the long-term benefits of your proposal: Describe the long-term, sustainable benefits that will come from the grant funding.
Communicate your strengths: Grant-awarding agencies are only going to award funding to the best qualified and capable applicants. Communicate your municipality's capacity to implement and manage the funding effectively.
Write clearly: Clear and concise writing is a must for winning proposals. There should never be any question as to what you intend to do and how you intend to do it if awarded funding.

Sources of Funding

Sources of grant funding vary widely. Grants can be given by Federal, as well as State Governments, corporations, private foundations and individual donors. According to governmentgrant.com, there 26 Federal Grant-making agencies that offer over 1,000 yearly grants that span the fields of housing, education, small business, community development, among others. State grants are also a great funding source. States offer their own grants as well as act as an allocator of federal grant funding. While these government grants are a great source of funding, because of their notoriety, they are often the most competitive sources of funding. Government grants are set by legislation and are made available to a wide range of applicants. Additionally, government grants are more likely than other types to be large in size. However, government grants do tend to be more bureaucratic which often results in lengthy and complex application processes.

An alternative to government grants are corporate, private foundation and non-profit organization grants. Corporate and private sector businesses often award grants and do so out of their own pocket. For that reason, when applying for these grants, it is a good idea to express how the funding will be used to benefit both your cause but also their bottom line. In addition to private foundations, non-profit organizations also award grants. They are able to do so as a result of fundraising efforts as well as through individual donations. If your municipality can identify a non-profit organization that awards grants and has goals that are in line with those of your community, they can be an excellent source of funding. As opposed to government grants, private sector grants are more likely to focus on emerging issues and can be less competitive. However, these grants are less likely to cover a projects full costs or indirect costs and are generally smaller than government grants.

In addition to being a source of grant funding, the private sector can also play an integral role in municipalities receiving grant funding. The private sector's role in this process is becoming commonplace as municipalities embrace the expertise and efficiency many firms can provide to their clients.

At Houseal Lavigne Associates, we have a successful track record of helping municipalities identify and obtain grant funding. Houseal Lavigne has unparalleled experience in assisting and authoring successful grant applications for public agencies. We are constantly researching available grant opportunities, assisting with applications, and monitoring the process of submitted grants on behalf of our clients. It is through these collaborative efforts that communities can secure the necessary funding they seek to become places of lasting value.

Resources for Identifying Funding Opportunities:

http://www.tgci.com/funding.shtml

https://www.cfda.gov/

http://www.recovery.gov/Opportunities/Pages/Grants.aspx

http://www.grants.gov/

http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/communitydevelopment/programs/

Grants for Trails

2011-01-29T23:00:55Z

During my presentation this morning at the Illinois parks and rec conference I noticed a number of people scrambling to write down the list of grants available to construct trails. I promised someone after the session that I'd post the list on our blog. So below, as promised, a list of some of the grants and grant programs that are available to fund trails.

Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP)
Designed to broaden the transportation focus from Interstate and Highways to making communities more livable.

Match: Up to 50 % for right-of-way and easement acquisition costs, and up to 80 % for preliminary engineering, utility relocations, engineering and construction costs.

Examples of eligible projects include:

Abandoned railway corridors for conversion to trails.

IDOT announces application solicitation depending upon funding. Typically application cycles are every 2 or 3 years.

Federal Recreational Trails Program
Created through the national recreational fund as part of ISTEA, this program provides funding for acquisition, development and maintenance of trails.

Match: 80/20 ($200,000 maximum for development)

Examples of eligible projects include:
Trail Construction and rehabilitation
Construction of trail support facilities
Property acquisition

Submit applications to the IDNR by March 1

Bike Path Grant Program
Created to financially assist in acquiring, constructing and rehabilitating public paths and related support facilities.

Match: 50/50 ($200,000 maximum)

Examples of eligible projects include:

Linear Corridor Land Acquisition
Trail development/renovation
Bridging, signage, and support facilities

Each application is evaluated on a competitive basis according to criteria set by IDNR.

Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development Program (OSLAD)
A state-financed grant program that provides funding assistance to local government agencies for acquisition and/or development of land for public parks and open space.

Match: 50/50

Maximum Amount: $400,000 for development, $750,000 for acquisition

Written applications must be submitted to IDNR between May 1 and July 1 of each year.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
The CMAQ program funds transportation projects that help non-attainment areas meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendment.

Match: 80/20

Examples of eligible projects include:

Bike and pedestrian projects

CMAP holds an annual Call for Projects.

Trail Master Planning

2011-01-03T21:42:42Z

Firm Principal Devin Lavigne and Senior Associate Trevor Dick will be speaking at the 2011 IPRA IAPD Parks and Recreation Conference. Their session, "Trail Master Planning" will teach participants the importance of creating trail master plans from a higher altitude, potential partnership opportunities, gaps in the trail system and better aligned future connections with adjacent communities. The session will also teach the importance of a comprehensive trails master planning and their role in ensuring tax dollars are spent efficiently and residents benefit from a balanced trail system.